Trademark search for:

QT 3.14

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2003-06-25 — Application filed
2003-12-01 — Final disposition recorded
2003-12-01 — Assigned to examiner
2004-07-21 — Assigned to examiner
2004-08-01 — Application abandoned
2004-08-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
2004-10-07 — Paper received
2004-10-07 — Petition to revive-received
2004-10-07 — Petition to revive-received
2005-02-16 — Petition to revive-granted
2005-02-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-03-02 — Assigned to lie
2005-03-05 — Law office publication review completed
2005-06-01 — Notice of publication
2005-06-21 — Published for opposition
2005-09-13 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-03-13 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2006-05-15 — Application abandoned
2006-05-15 — Application abandoned
2006-07-12 — Petition to revive-granted
2006-07-12 — Teas petition to revive received
2006-07-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-07-31 — Undeliverable mail - no action taken
2006-08-02 — New noa to issue
2006-09-19 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-03-20 — Final status recorded
2007-05-30 — Application abandoned
2007-05-30 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

Wemette, Jamie, Anne-Marie
San Diego , CA

Williams, Brent, Aaron
San Diego , CA

Wemette, Jamie, Anne-Marie
San Diego , CA

Williams, Brent, Aaron
San Diego , CA

Correspondent

WEMETTE, JAMIE QT-PIE CLOTHING COMPANY
1608 INDIA ST #602
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-06-25

Status Date:
2007-03-20

Category:
Clothing

Filing Year:
2003

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.