Trademark search for:

BEETLECAP

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2004-03-21 — Application filed
2004-03-31 — Application filed
2004-09-29 — Assigned to examiner
2004-09-30 — Final disposition recorded
2004-10-01 — Final disposition recorded
2004-12-27 — Paper received
2004-12-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-01-07 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-01-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-01-14 — Assigned to lie
2005-01-26 — Law office publication review completed
2005-04-20 — Notice of publication
2005-05-10 — Published for opposition
2005-08-02 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-01-27 — Teas statement of use received
2006-01-27 — Use amendment filed
2006-02-17 — Statement of use processing complete
2006-02-23 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2006-02-24 — Assigned to lie
2006-03-02 — Law office registration review completed
2006-04-11 — Registered-principal register
2009-08-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
2011-04-17 — Teas section 8 received
2011-05-04 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2011-05-07 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2015-04-11 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2016-11-18 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-11-18 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

DADA Corp.
Seoul KR

DADA Corp.
Seoul KR

DADA Corp.
Seoul KR

Correspondent

BOO YL PARK DADA CORPORATION
#790-4 Yeoksam-dong, Kangnam-ku
Seoul, 135-080
KOREA, REPUBLIC OF

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-03-21

Status Date:
2016-11-18

Category:
Clothing

Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.