Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2004 ›
BR ›
BROOKLYN SURFER
Trademark search for:
BROOKLYN SURFER
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-10-27 — Application filed
2004-11-05 — Application filed
2005-06-02 — Assigned to examiner
2005-06-03 — Final disposition recorded
2005-06-03 — Final disposition recorded
2005-12-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
2005-12-03 — Office action issued
2005-12-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-12-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-01-03 — Final disposition recorded
2006-01-03 — Final disposition recorded
2006-06-06 — Office action issued
2006-06-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-06-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-07-05 — Approved for registration supplemental register
2006-07-11 — Assigned to lie
2006-07-12 — Law office publication review completed
2006-08-22 — Registered-supplemental register
2011-12-12 — Teas change of correspondence received
2011-12-12 — Teas section 8 received
2011-12-19 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2011-12-19 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2011-12-19 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2015-08-22 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2017-04-07 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2017-04-07 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
GREEN, MICHAEL
San Francisco , CA
GREEN, MICHAEL
San Francisco , CA
Correspondent
GREEN, MICHAEL 790 Washington Ave, #638 Brooklyn, NY 11238 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-10-27
Status Date:
2017-04-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.