Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2004 ›
SH ›
SHOULDER LUXURY
Trademark search for:
SHOULDER LUXURY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-03-26 — Application filed
2004-04-02 — Application filed
2004-10-13 — Assigned to examiner
2004-10-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-10-22 — Assigned to lie
2004-11-03 — Law office publication review completed
2004-12-22 — Notice of publication
2005-01-11 — Published for opposition
2005-04-05 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-10-05 — Sou teas extension received
2005-10-05 — Sou extension 1 filed
2005-10-05 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-04-05 — Sou teas extension received
2006-04-05 — Sou extension 2 filed
2006-04-05 — Sou extension 2 granted
2006-10-02 — Sou teas extension received
2006-10-02 — Sou extension 3 filed
2006-10-02 — Sou extension 3 granted
2007-03-27 — Sou teas extension received
2007-03-27 — Sou extension 4 granted
2007-03-27 — Sou extension 4 filed
2007-10-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-10-05 — Sou teas extension received
2007-10-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-10-05 — Sou extension 5 filed
2007-10-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2007-10-16 — Sou extension 5 granted
2008-04-07 — Final status recorded
2008-06-10 — Application abandoned
2008-06-10 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Vanity Fair, Inc.
Bowling Green , KY
Vanity Fair, Inc.
Wilmington , DE
Correspondent
VANITY FAIR, INC. ONE FRUIT OF THE LOOM DRIVE LEGAL DEPARTMENT BOWLING GREEN, KY 42103
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-03-26
Status Date:
2008-04-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.