Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2005 ›
DD ›
D DYNAMITE
Trademark search for:
D DYNAMITE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-09-15 — Application filed
2005-09-22 — Application filed
2006-03-24 — Final disposition recorded
2006-03-24 — Assigned to examiner
2006-03-27 — Final disposition recorded
2006-09-05 — Paper received
2006-09-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-10-14 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-11-01 — Suspension letter written
2006-11-01 — Letter of suspension mailed
2007-05-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-11-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2007-11-01 — Assigned to lie
2008-01-08 — Assigned to examiner
2008-05-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-11-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2009-05-04 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2009-11-10 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2009-11-10 — Assigned to lie
2010-02-24 — Examiners amendment mailed
2010-02-24 — Examiners amendment -written
2010-03-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-03-01 — Examiner's amendment entered
2010-03-03 — Law office publication review completed
2010-03-17 — Notice of publication
2010-04-06 — Published for opposition
2010-06-01 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-11-23 — Sou teas extension received
2010-11-23 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-12-13 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-12-13 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-12-14 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2011-05-31 — Paper received
2011-05-31 — Sou extension 2 filed
2011-06-07 — Sou extension 2 granted
2011-06-08 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2011-11-14 — Sou teas extension received
2011-11-14 — Sou extension 3 filed
2011-11-17 — Sou extension 3 granted
2011-11-18 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2012-05-11 — Sou teas extension received
2012-05-11 — Sou extension 4 filed
2012-05-14 — Sou extension 4 granted
2012-05-15 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2012-11-30 — Sou teas extension received
2012-11-30 — Sou extension 5 filed
2012-12-03 — Sou extension 5 granted
2012-12-04 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2013-05-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2013-05-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2013-05-21 — Teas statement of use received
2013-05-21 — Use amendment filed
2013-05-29 — Statement of use processing complete
2013-05-30 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2013-06-14 — Law office registration review completed
2013-06-14 — Assigned to lie
2013-06-15 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2013-07-23 — Registered-principal register
2018-07-23 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2019-05-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
2019-07-19 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2019-08-29 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2019-08-29 — Registered - partial sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2019-08-29 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2022-07-23 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2024-02-02 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2024-02-02 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Groupe Dynamite Inc.
Mont-Royal CA
Groupe Dynamite Inc.
Mont-Royal CA
Groupe Dynamite Inc.
Mont-Royal CA
Correspondent
Robert M. O'Connell Jr. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 2050 Main Street, Suite 1100 IP Prosecution Department Irvine, CA 92614-8255
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-09-15
Status Date:
2024-02-02
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.