Trademark search for:

BROOKSFLANNEL

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2006-06-13 — Application filed
2006-06-16 — Application filed
2006-06-17 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2006-10-02 — Assigned to examiner
2006-10-05 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-10-05 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-10-06 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-10-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-10-24 — Assigned to lie
2006-10-26 — Law office publication review completed
2006-11-29 — Notice of publication
2006-12-19 — Published for opposition
2007-03-06 — Registered-principal register
2007-04-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
2011-08-17 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2012-06-13 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2012-06-20 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2012-06-20 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2012-06-20 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2014-11-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2014-11-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2016-03-06 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2017-10-13 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2017-10-13 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

BROOKS BROTHERS GROUP, INC.
ENFIELD , CT

RETAIL BRAND ALLIANCE, INC.
ENFIELD , CT

RETAIL BRAND ALLIANCE, INC.
ENFIELD , CT

RETAIL BRAND ALLIANCE, INC.
ENFIELD , CT

Correspondent

Lisa W. Rosaya Baker & McKenzie LLP
452 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2006-06-13

Status Date:
2017-10-13

Category:
Clothing

Filing Year:
2006

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.