Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2006 ›
PU ›
PUD'N
Trademark search for:
PUD'N
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-04-15 — Application filed
2006-04-20 — Application filed
2006-04-21 — Notice of design search code mailed
2006-09-21 — Assigned to examiner
2006-09-22 — Final disposition recorded
2006-09-22 — Final disposition recorded
2007-01-14 — Office action issued
2007-02-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-02-07 — Assigned to lie
2007-02-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-02-28 — Suspension letter written
2007-02-28 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2007-05-08 — Office action issued
2007-05-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-05-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-06-05 — Suspension letter written
2007-06-05 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2007-12-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-06-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-06-06 — Assigned to lie
2008-12-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-12-12 — Law office publication review completed
2008-12-31 — Notice of publication
2009-01-20 — Published for opposition
2009-04-14 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2009-11-16 — Application abandoned
2009-11-16 — Application abandoned
2009-11-16 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Schultz, Andrew T.
Chicago , IL
Schultz, Andrew T.
Chicago , IL
Correspondent
SCHULTZ, ANDREW T 1522 W FARGO AVE CHICAGO, IL 60626-1835 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-04-15
Status Date:
2009-11-16
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.