Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2006 ›
SP ›
SPOTTER WANNABE
Trademark search for:
SPOTTER WANNABE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-05-08 — Application filed
2006-05-11 — Application filed
2006-05-12 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2006-10-10 — Assigned to examiner
2006-10-15 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-10-15 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-10-15 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-10-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-10-27 — Assigned to lie
2006-10-31 — Law office publication review completed
2006-12-06 — Notice of publication
2006-12-26 — Published for opposition
2007-03-20 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-09-19 — Sou teas extension received
2007-09-19 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-09-19 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-03-20 — Sou extension 2 filed
2008-05-23 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2008-05-23 — Petition to revive-granted
2008-05-23 — Teas petition to revive received
2008-06-03 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-09-18 — Sou teas extension received
2008-09-18 — Sou extension 3 filed
2008-09-22 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-09-22 — Sou extension 3 granted
2009-04-20 — Application abandoned
2009-04-20 — Application abandoned
2009-04-20 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Spotter Wannabe, Inc.
Costa Mesa , CA
Spotter Wannabe, Inc.
Costa Mesa , CA
Correspondent
Roger N. Behle, Jr. FOLEY BEZEK BEHLE & CURTIS, LLP 575 ANTON BLVD STE 710 COSTA MESA, CA 92626-7039 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-05-08
Status Date:
2009-04-20
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.