Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2007 ›
AN ›
ANIZE
Trademark search for:
ANIZE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-08-24 — Application filed
2007-08-28 — Application filed
2007-12-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-12-03 — Assigned to examiner
2008-01-16 — Assigned to lie
2008-01-16 — Law office publication review completed
2008-01-30 — Notice of publication
2008-02-19 — Published for opposition
2008-05-13 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-11-13 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-12-15 — Application abandoned
2008-12-15 — Application abandoned
2009-02-10 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2009-02-10 — Petition to revive-granted
2009-02-10 — Teas petition to revive received
2009-02-26 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-02-26 — Undeliverable mail - no action taken
2009-02-26 — Sou extension 1 granted
2009-03-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
2009-05-13 — Teas statement of use received
2009-05-13 — Use amendment filed
2009-05-27 — Statement of use processing complete
2009-05-29 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2009-06-01 — Law office registration review completed
2009-07-07 — Registered-principal register
2015-05-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-02-12 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2016-02-12 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Anize LLC
New York , NY
Anize LLC
New York , NY
Anize LLC
New York , NY
Correspondent
Louis C. Paul Louis C. Paul and Associates, PLLC. 299 Park Avenue, 6th Floor New York, NY 10171 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-08-24
Status Date:
2016-02-12
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.