Brandinium

Trademark search for:

BRONTE & TALLULAH

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2007-04-05 — Application filed
  • 2007-04-09 — Application filed
  • 2007-04-10 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2007-07-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2007-07-19 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-08-30 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-08-30 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2007-09-12 — Notice of publication
  • 2007-10-02 — Published for opposition
  • 2007-11-01 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2008-01-31 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2008-03-20 — Ttab release case to trademarks
  • 2008-03-20 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
  • 2008-03-20 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2008-04-29 — Registered-principal register
  • 2009-05-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2014-03-12 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) filed
  • 2014-03-12 — Paper received
  • 2014-03-28 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2014-03-28 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8
  • 2015-01-07 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2015-01-07 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Cocomo Apparel, Inc.
Los Angeles , CA
Volume One Apparel, Inc.
Los Angeles , CA
Cocomo Apparel, Inc.
Los Angeles , CA
Volume One Apparel, Inc.
Los Angeles , CA
Cocomo Apparel, Inc.
Los Angeles , CA
Volume One Apparel, Inc.
Los Angeles , CA

Correspondent

Vano Haroutunian Ballon Stoll Bader & Nadler, P.C.
729 Seventh Avenue
17th Floor
New York, NY 10019

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2007-04-05
Status Date:
2015-01-07
Category:
Clothing
Filing Year:
2007

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.