Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2007 ›
WE ›
WE CHAOS
Trademark search for:
WE CHAOS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-10-31 — Application filed
2007-11-05 — Application filed
2007-11-06 — Notice of design search code mailed
2008-02-12 — Assigned to examiner
2008-02-13 — Suspension letter written
2008-02-14 — Letter of suspension mailed
2008-08-14 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-08-14 — Assigned to lie
2009-02-19 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2009-08-21 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2010-02-22 — Assigned to lie
2010-02-23 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2010-08-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2011-03-08 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2011-09-13 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2011-09-27 — Assigned to lie
2011-09-27 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2011-10-06 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2012-03-20 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2012-04-11 — Final disposition recorded
2012-04-11 — Final disposition recorded
2012-11-26 — Application abandoned
2012-11-26 — Application abandoned
2012-11-26 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Dynasty Footwear, Ltd.
El Segundo , CA
Correspondent
Evan M. Kent MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP 11377 WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1683 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-10-31
Status Date:
2012-11-26
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.