Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2008 ›
CA ›
CANTERBURY RUGBY
Trademark search for:
CANTERBURY RUGBY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-08-14 — Application filed
2008-08-18 — Application filed
2008-11-21 — Assigned to examiner
2008-12-01 — Final disposition recorded
2008-12-01 — Final disposition recorded
2008-12-01 — Final disposition recorded
2009-06-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-06-01 — Office action issued
2009-06-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-06-22 — Office action issued
2009-06-22 — Office action issued
2009-06-22 — Office action issued
2009-06-24 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2009-06-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-06-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-06-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-06-30 — Assigned to lie
2009-06-30 — Law office publication review completed
2009-07-15 — Notice of publication
2009-08-04 — Published for opposition
2009-09-01 — Extension of time to oppose received
2009-12-02 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2010-06-02 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2011-01-21 — Application abandoned
2011-01-21 — Application abandoned
2011-01-21 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
2011-01-21 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2011-01-21 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Canterbury Limited
Auckland NZ
Canterbury Limited
Auckland NZ
Correspondent
SCOTT S. HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLP ONE BOULDER PLAZA 1800 BROADWAY BOULDER, CO 80302
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-08-14
Status Date:
2011-01-21
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.