Brandinium

Trademark search for:

DEER CITY USA

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2008-08-08 — Application filed
  • 2008-08-12 — Application filed
  • 2008-11-18 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-11-19 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2008-11-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-11-19 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2008-11-19 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2008-11-19 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2008-11-24 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-11-24 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-12-10 — Notice of publication
  • 2008-12-30 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-03-24 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2009-09-24 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2009-10-26 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-10-26 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-12-26 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2009-12-26 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2009-12-26 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2010-02-23 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-02-23 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2010-03-24 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2010-04-26 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-04-26 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-06-27 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2010-06-27 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2010-06-27 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2010-06-29 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2010-06-30 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-09-24 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2010-10-25 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-10-25 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-12-22 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2010-12-22 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2010-12-22 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2010-12-27 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2010-12-28 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-12-29 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2011-03-24 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2011-04-25 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-04-25 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-06-16 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2011-06-16 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2011-06-22 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2011-06-22 — Use amendment filed
  • 2011-06-22 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2011-06-22 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2011-06-22 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2011-06-23 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2011-06-23 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2011-06-24 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-06-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-06-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-07-15 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2011-07-18 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2011-07-19 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2011-08-23 — Registered-principal register
  • 2017-08-22 — Teas section 8 received
  • 2017-09-11 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2017-09-13 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
  • 2017-09-13 — Registered - partial sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
  • 2020-08-23 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2022-03-11 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2022-03-11 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Wolf Creek Productions, Inc.
Perry , MI
Wolf Creek Productions, Inc.
Perry , MI
Wolf Creek Productions, Inc.
Perry , MI

Correspondent

Jared A. Roberts McClelland & Anderson LLP
1305 South Washington Ave
Suite 102
Lansing, MI 48910

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-08-08
Status Date:
2022-03-11
Category:
Clothing
Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.