Brandinium

Trademark search for:

EAT DRINK AND NEVER REMARRY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2008-02-04 — Application filed
  • 2008-02-07 — Application filed
  • 2008-05-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-05-13 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-05-13 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-05-13 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-05-28 — Notice of publication
  • 2008-06-17 — Published for opposition
  • 2008-09-09 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2009-03-09 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2009-04-10 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2009-04-10 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2009-04-10 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2009-04-30 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2009-04-30 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2009-09-09 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2009-10-12 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-10-13 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-10-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-10-25 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2009-10-25 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2009-10-25 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2009-11-03 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2010-03-09 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2010-04-12 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-04-12 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-06-14 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2010-06-14 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2010-06-14 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2010-06-17 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2010-06-18 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-09-09 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2010-10-11 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-10-12 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-12-06 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2010-12-06 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2010-12-06 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2011-01-04 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2011-01-05 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-03-09 — Use amendment filed
  • 2011-03-09 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2011-04-11 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-04-11 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-05-30 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2011-05-30 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2011-05-30 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2011-05-30 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2011-06-09 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2011-06-09 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2011-06-10 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-06-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-06-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-06-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-12-13 — Office action issued
  • 2011-12-15 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-12-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-12-24 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-01-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-01-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-01-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-05-25 — Office action issued
  • 2012-06-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-06-08 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-06-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-06-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-06-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-01-09 — Application abandoned
  • 2013-01-09 — Application abandoned
  • 2013-01-09 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Looby, Bridget A
Bay City , MI
Larson, Ronald V
Saginaw , MI
Looby, Bridget A
Saginaw , MI
Larson, Ronald V
Saginaw , MI

Correspondent

Bridget Looby
2261 Fairway Pines Court
Bay City, MI 48706
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-02-04
Status Date:
2013-01-09
Category:
Clothing
Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.