Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2008 ›
ES ›
ESKAY
Trademark search for:
ESKAY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-03-20 — Application filed
2008-03-25 — Application filed
2008-06-25 — Assigned to examiner
2008-06-26 — Examiners amendment -written
2008-06-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-06-26 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2008-06-26 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2008-06-26 — Examiner's amendment entered
2008-06-27 — Assigned to lie
2008-06-27 — Law office publication review completed
2008-07-16 — Notice of publication
2008-08-05 — Published for opposition
2008-10-28 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2009-02-09 — Teas statement of use received
2009-02-09 — Use amendment filed
2009-02-24 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-02-24 — Statement of use processing complete
2009-04-19 — Final disposition recorded
2009-04-19 — Final disposition recorded
2009-04-19 — Final disposition recorded
2009-05-01 — Office action issued
2009-05-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-05-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-06-30 — Office action issued
2009-06-30 — Office action issued
2009-06-30 — Office action issued
2010-02-04 — Application abandoned
2010-02-04 — Final status recorded
2010-02-05 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Kim, Steve J
Los Angeles , CA
Kim, Steve J
Los Angeles , CA
Correspondent
KIM, STEVE J KIM, STEVE J 940 E JEFFERSON BLVD LOS ANGELES, CA 90011-2548 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-03-20
Status Date:
2010-02-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.