Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2008 ›
ET ›
ÉTHIQUE CONFECTION
Trademark search for:
ÉTHIQUE CONFECTION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-04-09 — Application filed
2008-04-14 — Application filed
2008-04-22 — Teas amendment entered before attorney assigned
2008-04-22 — Teas voluntary amendment received
2008-07-21 — Final disposition recorded
2008-07-21 — Final disposition recorded
2008-07-21 — Assigned to examiner
2008-07-21 — Final disposition recorded
2009-01-08 — Office action issued
2009-01-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-01-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-02-12 — Examiners amendment -written
2009-02-12 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-02-12 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-02-12 — Examiner's amendment entered
2009-02-13 — Examiners amendment -written
2009-02-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-02-13 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-02-13 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-02-13 — Examiner's amendment entered
2009-02-21 — Assigned to lie
2009-02-21 — Law office publication review completed
2009-03-11 — Notice of publication
2009-03-31 — Published for opposition
2009-06-16 — Registered-principal register
2016-01-22 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2016-01-22 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Style and System
Osaka JP
Style and System
Osaka JP
Style and System
Osaka JP
Correspondent
AKIKO ADDLESPURGER 307 23RD ST SACRAMENTO, CA 95816-3011 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-04-09
Status Date:
2016-01-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.