Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2009 ›
TE ›
TEO GREEN
Trademark search for:
TEO GREEN
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-03-17 — Application filed
2009-03-20 — Application filed
2009-03-20 — Application filed
2009-06-08 — Assigned to examiner
2009-06-09 — Final disposition recorded
2009-06-09 — Final disposition recorded
2009-06-09 — Final disposition recorded
2009-09-14 — Office action issued
2009-09-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-09-16 — Assigned to lie
2009-09-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-10-14 — Final disposition recorded
2009-10-14 — Final disposition recorded
2009-10-14 — Final disposition recorded
2009-10-16 — Examiners amendment -written
2009-10-16 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-10-16 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-10-16 — Examiner's amendment entered
2009-11-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-11-12 — Law office publication review completed
2009-11-23 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2010-02-23 — Published for opposition
2010-02-23 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-05-11 — Registered-principal register
2014-03-11 — Notice of suit
2016-12-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2016-12-16 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
DAUPHITEX
RILLIEUX LA PAPE FR
DAUPHITEX
RILLIEUX LA PAPE FR
DAUPHITEX
RILLIEUX LA PAPE FR
Correspondent
WILLIAM C. WRIGHT EPSTEIN DRANGEL BAZERMAN & JAMES, LLP 60 E 42ND ST STE 820 NEW YORK, NY 10165-0808 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-03-17
Status Date:
2016-12-16
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.