Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2010 ›
AL ›
ALLTHATGLITTERS21
Trademark search for:
ALLTHATGLITTERS21
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-11-05 — Application filed
2010-11-09 — Application filed
2010-11-10 — Application filed
2010-11-11 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2011-02-15 — Assigned to examiner
2011-02-16 — Final disposition recorded
2011-02-16 — Final disposition recorded
2011-02-16 — Final disposition recorded
2011-04-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2011-04-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2011-08-10 — Teas change of owner address received
2011-08-10 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2011-08-23 — Teas voluntary amendment received
2011-08-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-08-30 — Assigned to lie
2011-08-31 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2011-09-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-10-05 — Notice of unresponsive amendment - e-mailed
2011-10-05 — Notification of notice of unresponsive amendment - e-mailed
2011-10-05 — Report unresponsive amendment - completed
2011-10-06 — Office action issued
2011-10-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-10-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-10-28 — Office action issued
2011-10-28 — Office action issued
2011-10-28 — Office action issued
2012-04-30 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2012-04-30 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2012-04-30 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2012-04-30 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2012-04-30 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2012-05-02 — Suspension letter written
2012-05-02 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2012-05-02 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2012-11-02 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2012-11-21 — Office action issued
2012-11-21 — Final disposition recorded
2012-11-21 — Final disposition recorded
2013-05-20 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2013-05-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-05-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-02-27 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2014-02-27 — Office action issued
2014-02-28 — Fax received
2014-02-28 — Divisional request received
2014-03-10 — Divisional processing complete
2014-06-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
2014-06-25 — Law office publication review completed
2014-07-09 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2014-07-29 — Published for opposition
2014-07-29 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2014-09-23 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2015-03-20 — Sou teas extension received
2015-03-20 — Sou extension 1 filed
2015-04-03 — Sou extension 1 granted
2015-04-04 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2015-08-20 — Sou teas extension received
2015-08-20 — Sou extension 2 filed
2015-09-01 — Sou extension 2 granted
2015-09-02 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2016-03-14 — Sou teas extension received
2016-03-14 — Sou extension 3 filed
2016-03-26 — Sou extension 3 granted
2016-03-29 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2016-08-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-08-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-10-24 — Application abandoned
2016-10-24 — Application abandoned
2016-10-24 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
EBIP, LLC
SEATTLE , WA
EBIP, LLC
SEATTLE , WA
Lisa Fowler (also known as Elle Fowler)
Seattle , WA
Correspondent
NANCY V STEPHENS FOSTER PEPPER PLLC 1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3000 SEATTLE, WA 98101-3264 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-11-05
Status Date:
2016-10-24
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.