Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2010 ›
TH ›
THE FRILE
Trademark search for:
THE FRILE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-02-10 — Application filed
2010-02-13 — Application filed
2010-02-18 — Application filed
2010-05-12 — Assigned to examiner
2010-05-14 — Final disposition recorded
2010-05-14 — Final disposition recorded
2010-05-14 — Final disposition recorded
2010-05-18 — Examiners amendment -written
2010-05-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-05-18 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2010-05-18 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2010-05-18 — Examiner's amendment entered
2010-06-01 — Assigned to lie
2010-06-01 — Law office publication review completed
2010-07-06 — Published for opposition
2010-07-06 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-08-31 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-02-28 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2011-04-04 — Application abandoned
2011-04-04 — Application abandoned
2011-05-06 — Petition to revive-granted
2011-05-06 — Teas petition to revive received
2011-05-10 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2011-05-10 — New noa to issue
2011-06-21 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-01-23 — Application abandoned
2012-01-23 — Application abandoned
2012-01-23 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Davis, Kimrie
Beverly Hills , CA
Davis, Kimrie
Beverly Hills , CA
Correspondent
DAVIS, KIMRIE 269 S BEVERLY DR # 1173 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-3851 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-02-10
Status Date:
2012-01-23
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.