Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2011 ›
AA ›
AARDVARK NYC
Trademark search for:
AARDVARK NYC
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-05-05 — Application filed
2011-05-09 — Application filed
2011-05-11 — Application filed
2011-05-12 — Notice of design search code mailed
2011-08-17 — Assigned to examiner
2011-08-23 — Examiners amendment -written
2011-08-23 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2011-08-23 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2011-08-23 — Examiner's amendment entered
2011-08-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-09-14 — Assigned to lie
2011-09-16 — Law office publication review completed
2011-10-25 — Published for opposition
2011-10-25 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2011-12-20 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-06-19 — Teas statement of use received
2012-06-19 — Use amendment filed
2012-06-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
2012-07-16 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-07-16 — Statement of use processing complete
2012-08-07 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2012-08-07 — Law office registration review completed
2012-08-08 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2012-09-11 — Registered-principal register
2017-09-11 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2019-04-12 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2019-04-12 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Bruhn, Max
Kingston , NY
Bruhn, Max
Kingston , NY
Bruhn, Max
Astoria , NY
Correspondent
BRUHN, MAX BRUHN, MAX 223 Smith Ave Kingston, NY 12401 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-05-05
Status Date:
2019-04-12
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.