Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2012 ›
BB ›
B.Y.T.
Trademark search for:
B.Y.T.
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-04-24 — Application filed
2012-04-27 — Application filed
2012-05-01 — Application filed
2012-05-02 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2012-08-10 — Assigned to examiner
2012-08-16 — Final disposition recorded
2012-08-17 — Final disposition recorded
2012-09-07 — Teas change of owner address received
2012-09-07 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2013-02-15 — Office action issued
2013-02-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-02-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-03-14 — Suspension letter written
2013-03-15 — Letter of suspension mailed
2013-09-26 — Assigned to lie
2013-09-26 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2013-10-15 — Suspension inquiry written
2013-10-15 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2013-10-22 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2013-10-31 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-10-31 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-11-20 — Suspension letter written
2013-11-21 — Letter of suspension mailed
2014-05-28 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2014-06-17 — Suspension inquiry written
2014-06-18 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2015-01-26 — Application abandoned
2015-01-26 — Application abandoned
2015-01-26 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Kotur Limited
Sheung Wan HK
Correspondent
LAWRENCE E. APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C. 866 UNITED NATIONS PLZ NEW YORK, NY 10017-1822 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-04-24
Status Date:
2015-01-26
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.