Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2012 ›
CH ›
CHIRIPA
Trademark search for:
CHIRIPA
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-11-29 — Application filed
2012-12-03 — Application filed
2012-12-11 — Application filed
2013-03-20 — Assigned to examiner
2013-03-23 — Final disposition recorded
2013-03-23 — Final disposition recorded
2013-03-23 — Final disposition recorded
2013-09-23 — Office action issued
2013-09-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-09-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-11-22 — Final disposition recorded
2013-11-22 — Final disposition recorded
2013-11-22 — Final disposition recorded
2014-05-22 — Office action issued
2014-05-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-05-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-05-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
2014-06-09 — Assigned to lie
2014-06-09 — Law office publication review completed
2014-06-20 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2014-08-17 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2014-12-15 — Office action issued
2014-12-15 — Office action issued
2014-12-15 — Office action issued
2015-06-15 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2015-06-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-06-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-06-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-07-07 — Assigned to lie
2015-07-07 — Law office publication review completed
2015-07-22 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2015-08-11 — Published for opposition
2015-08-11 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2015-09-23 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2015-10-06 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-04-06 — Sou teas extension received
2016-04-06 — Sou extension 1 filed
2016-05-06 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2016-05-09 — Sou extension 1 granted
2016-05-10 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2016-10-06 — Teas request to divide received
2016-10-06 — Teas petition to amend basis received
2016-10-06 — Divisional request received
2016-10-06 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2016-10-14 — Divisional processing complete
2016-10-14 — Assigned to petition staff
2016-10-17 — Petition to director - change basis - granted
2016-10-17 — Attorney review/decision on amendment required
2016-12-12 — Final disposition recorded
2016-12-12 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2016-12-12 — Final disposition recorded
2016-12-12 — Final disposition recorded
2017-06-12 — Office action issued
2017-06-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-06-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-09-11 — Final disposition recorded
2017-09-11 — Final disposition recorded
2017-09-11 — Final disposition recorded
2018-03-12 — Office action issued
2018-03-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-03-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-03-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2018-03-22 — Assigned to lie
2018-04-02 — Law office publication review completed
2018-04-18 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2018-05-08 — Published for opposition
2018-05-08 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2018-07-24 — Registered-principal register
2023-07-24 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2025-02-07 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2025-02-07 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
DRACCO BRANDS HOLDING APS
2800 KGS. LYNGBY DK
DRACCO BRANDS HOLDING APS
2800 KGS. LYNGBY DK
Home Focus Development Limited
Tortola VG
Correspondent
KRISTINE L. BUTLER VOLPE AND KOENIG, P.C. 30 S 17TH ST PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4001 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-11-29
Status Date:
2025-02-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.