Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2012 ›
FL ›
FLIRTY WEAR
Trademark search for:
FLIRTY WEAR
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-03-23 — Application filed
2012-03-30 — Application filed
2012-06-28 — Assigned to examiner
2012-07-05 — Final disposition recorded
2012-07-05 — Final disposition recorded
2012-07-05 — Final disposition recorded
2012-08-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-08-10 — Office action issued
2012-08-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-08-31 — Suspension letter written
2012-08-31 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2012-08-31 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-02-12 — Teas change of owner address received
2013-02-12 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2013-03-04 — Assigned to lie
2013-03-07 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2013-09-12 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2014-03-13 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2014-09-18 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2015-03-26 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2015-04-16 — Office action issued
2015-04-16 — Office action issued
2015-04-16 — Office action issued
2015-11-17 — Application abandoned
2015-11-17 — Application abandoned
2015-11-17 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
INO-PRODUCTS INC.
Toronto, Ontario CA
Correspondent
LORI K. HALL GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP ONE MAIN STREET WEST HAMILTON, ONTARIO, L8P4Z5 CANADA
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-03-23
Status Date:
2015-11-17
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.