Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2013 ›
CA ›
CAJUN STOP
Trademark search for:
CAJUN STOP
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2013-01-23 — Application filed
2013-01-26 — Application filed
2013-01-29 — Application filed
2013-05-06 — Assigned to examiner
2013-05-07 — Final disposition recorded
2013-05-07 — Final disposition recorded
2013-05-07 — Final disposition recorded
2013-09-20 — Office action issued
2013-09-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-09-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-10-17 — Priority action written
2013-10-17 — Priority action e-mailed
2013-10-17 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
2013-10-29 — Examiners amendment -written
2013-10-29 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2013-10-29 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2013-10-29 — Examiner's amendment entered
2013-10-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-11-19 — Assigned to lie
2013-11-19 — Law office publication review completed
2013-12-04 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2013-12-24 — Published for opposition
2013-12-24 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2014-02-18 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2014-06-27 — Teas statement of use received
2014-06-27 — Use amendment filed
2014-06-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
2014-07-18 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2014-07-22 — Statement of use processing complete
2014-08-14 — Final disposition recorded
2014-08-14 — Final disposition recorded
2014-08-14 — Final disposition recorded
2014-09-22 — Office action issued
2014-09-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-09-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-09-26 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2014-09-27 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2014-11-04 — Registered-principal register
2016-11-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-01-09 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2017-01-09 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2017-10-31 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2017-10-31 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2020-02-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-05-04 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2021-05-18 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2021-05-18 — Office action issued
2021-05-20 — Office action issued
2021-05-24 — Proof of use interim action issued
2021-09-23 — Office action issued
2021-09-29 — Registered - partial sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2021-09-29 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2021-11-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-11-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-11-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-11-10 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-11-10 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-11-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
2022-08-01 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2022-08-01 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2022-08-01 — Teas change of correspondence received
2023-11-04 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2025-05-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2025-05-16 — Final status recorded
2025-06-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
2025-06-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2025-06-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
Owner Information
Lisa Carnley
Houston , TX
Lisa Carnley
Houston , TX
Lisa Carnley
Houston , TX
Correspondent
Dileep P. Rao Kearney, McWiliams & Davis 55 Waugh, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77007 United States
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2013-01-23
Status Date:
2025-05-16
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.