Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2013 ›
KI ›
KICK ASS JACK'D
Trademark search for:
KICK ASS JACK'D
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2013-03-06 — Application filed
2013-03-09 — Application filed
2013-03-11 — Application filed
2013-03-12 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2013-06-17 — Assigned to examiner
2013-06-21 — Final disposition recorded
2013-06-21 — Final disposition recorded
2013-06-21 — Final disposition recorded
2013-12-18 — Office action issued
2014-01-09 — Assigned to lie
2014-01-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-01-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-02-06 — Priority action written
2014-02-06 — Priority action e-mailed
2014-02-06 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
2014-08-06 — Office action issued
2014-08-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-08-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-09-03 — Suspension letter written
2014-09-03 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-09-03 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-03-11 — Suspension inquiry written
2015-03-11 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2015-03-11 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2015-07-27 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2015-08-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-08-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-08-07 — Suspension letter written
2015-08-07 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-08-07 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-02-29 — Assigned to lie
2016-03-01 — Suspension inquiry written
2016-03-01 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2016-03-01 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2016-03-23 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2016-03-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-03-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-04-19 — Suspension letter written
2016-04-19 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-04-19 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-10-07 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2016-10-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-10-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-10-21 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2016-11-17 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2016-12-15 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2017-01-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-01-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-01-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2017-01-28 — Law office publication review completed
2017-02-14 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2017-02-22 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2017-03-14 — Final disposition recorded
2017-03-14 — Final disposition recorded
2017-03-14 — Final disposition recorded
2017-07-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-07-27 — Office action issued
2017-07-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-08-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
2017-08-17 — Law office publication review completed
2017-08-30 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2017-09-19 — Published for opposition
2017-09-19 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-10-04 — Extension of time to oppose received
2018-01-18 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2019-05-02 — Application abandoned
2019-05-02 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
2019-05-02 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2019-05-02 — Application abandoned
2019-05-02 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
David John Critchley
Cheshire GB
David John Critchley
Cheshire GB
Correspondent
PETER KUNIN & CATHLEEN E STADECKER DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC 199 MAIN ST P O BOX 190 BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0190
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2013-03-06
Status Date:
2019-05-02
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.