Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2013 ›
PR ›
PRETTYMAX
Trademark search for:
PRETTYMAX
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2013-04-10 — Application filed
2013-04-13 — Application filed
2013-04-17 — Application filed
2013-04-18 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2013-07-24 — Final disposition recorded
2013-07-24 — Removed from teas plus
2013-07-24 — Final disposition recorded
2013-07-24 — Assigned to examiner
2013-07-24 — Final disposition recorded
2013-09-14 — Office action issued
2013-09-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-09-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-09-22 — Office action issued
2013-09-22 — Office action issued
2013-09-22 — Office action issued
2014-01-28 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2014-02-03 — Assigned to lie
2014-02-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-02-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-02-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
2014-02-19 — Law office publication review completed
2014-03-05 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2014-03-25 — Published for opposition
2014-03-25 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2014-05-20 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2014-11-20 — Sou teas extension received
2014-11-20 — Sou extension 1 filed
2014-11-20 — Sou extension 1 granted
2014-11-22 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2015-06-22 — Application abandoned
2015-06-22 — Application abandoned
2015-06-22 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Kumar, Hament
Kumar, Hament
Correspondent
KUMAR, HAMENT
Filing Details
Filing Date:
Status Date:
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.
