Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ROY?L CLOTHING

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2013-03-05 — Application filed
  • 2013-03-08 — Application filed
  • 2013-03-11 — Application filed
  • 2013-03-12 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
  • 2013-04-15 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2013-04-15 — Teas amendment entered before attorney assigned
  • 2013-06-17 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2013-06-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-06-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-06-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-08-30 — Office action issued
  • 2013-08-30 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-08-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-09-23 — Suspension letter written
  • 2013-09-23 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-09-23 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-03-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2014-09-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2015-01-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2015-01-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-01-05 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2015-01-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-02-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2015-02-20 — Assigned to lie
  • 2015-03-05 — Assigned to lie
  • 2015-03-06 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2015-03-25 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2015-04-14 — Published for opposition
  • 2015-04-14 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2015-06-09 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2015-12-08 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2015-12-08 — Use amendment filed
  • 2016-01-22 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2016-01-23 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2016-01-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-01-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-01-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2016-07-26 — Office action issued
  • 2016-08-01 — Assigned to lie
  • 2016-08-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-08-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2016-08-07 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2016-08-09 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2016-09-13 — Registered-principal register
  • 2021-09-13 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2023-03-13 — Teas section 8 received
  • 2023-03-31 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2023-03-31 — Office action issued
  • 2023-10-05 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2023-10-22 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2023-10-24 — Notice of cancellation sec. 8 emailed
  • 2023-10-24 — Teas petition to director received
  • 2024-02-05 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2024-02-05 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2024-02-05 — Petition to director granted
  • 2024-02-06 — Reinstated
  • 2024-02-06 — Office action issued
  • 2024-03-07 — Office action issued
  • 2024-03-13 — Office action issued
  • 2024-10-20 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2024-10-20 — Notice of cancellation sec. 8 emailed
  • 2024-10-20 — Final status recorded
  • 2024-11-07 — Teas petition to director received
  • 2025-01-23 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2025-01-24 — Petition to director withdrawn

Owner Information

Afolabi, Adedayo O.
Valley Stream , NY
Afolabi, Adedayo O.
Valley Stream , NY
Afolabi, Adedayo O.
Valley Stream , NY

Correspondent

Sabine K. Franco The Ambitious Legacy Firm, P.C.
626 RXR Plaza West Tower, 6th Floor
Uniondale, NY 11556
United States

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2013-03-05
Status Date:
2024-10-20
Category:
Clothing
Filing Year:
2013

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.