Trademark search for:

1BROW(H)ARD1 FOR THOSE WHO HAVE/HAD ALL(:O)T TO THINK ABOUT... AN R-U-THINKING COMPANY.

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2014-12-22 — Application filed
2014-12-25 — Application filed
2014-12-29 — Application filed
2014-12-30 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2015-03-31 — Assigned to examiner
2015-04-09 — Final disposition recorded
2015-04-09 — Final disposition recorded
2015-04-09 — Final disposition recorded
2015-04-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
2015-04-15 — Office action issued
2015-04-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-04-16 — Assigned to lie
2015-04-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-05-06 — Examiners amendment -written
2015-05-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-05-06 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2015-05-06 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2015-05-06 — Examiner's amendment entered
2015-05-12 — Law office publication review completed
2015-05-27 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2015-06-16 — Published for opposition
2015-06-16 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2015-08-11 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-03-14 — Application abandoned
2016-03-14 — Application abandoned
2016-03-14 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

1BROW(H)ARD1 CORPORATION
Hollywood , FL

1BROW(H)ARD1 CORPORATION
Hollywood , FL

Correspondent

HAMLET ROYSTON BENT JR 1BROW(H)ARD1 CORPORATION
2616 ADAMS ST
HOLLYWOOD, FL 33020-5720
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2014-12-22

Status Date:
2016-03-14

Category:
Clothing

Filing Year:
2014

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.