Trademark search for:

GO+BEFANCY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2014-10-23 — Application filed
2014-10-27 — Application filed
2014-10-30 — Application filed
2014-10-31 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2015-02-11 — Assigned to examiner
2015-02-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-03-11 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2015-03-31 — Published for opposition
2015-03-31 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2015-05-26 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2015-11-05 — Teas statement of use received
2015-11-05 — Use amendment filed
2015-11-19 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2015-11-19 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2015-11-21 — Statement of use processing complete
2015-12-18 — Final disposition recorded
2015-12-18 — Final disposition recorded
2015-12-18 — Final disposition recorded
2016-07-15 — Application abandoned
2016-07-18 — Application abandoned
2016-08-02 — Office action issued
2016-08-02 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2016-08-02 — Teas petition to revive received
2016-08-06 — Assigned to lie
2016-08-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-08-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-09-29 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
2016-11-14 — Petition to revive-denied
2016-11-14 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Green, Stacey
Rolling Hills Estates , CA

Green, Stacey
Rolling Hills Estates , CA

Correspondent

GREEN, STACEY
27727 SADDLE RD
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, CA 90274-5129
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2014-10-23

Status Date:
2016-11-14

Category:
Clothing

Filing Year:
2014

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.