Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2015 ›
CA ›
CARDINEZ
Trademark search for:
CARDINEZ
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2015-04-15 — Application filed
2015-04-18 — Application filed
2015-04-23 — Application filed
2015-07-23 — Assigned to examiner
2015-07-30 — Final disposition recorded
2015-07-30 — Final disposition recorded
2015-07-30 — Final disposition recorded
2015-11-11 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2015-11-11 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2016-01-26 — Teas amendment of use received
2016-01-27 — Use amendment filed
2016-01-27 — Amendment to use processing complete
2016-01-27 — Office action issued
2016-02-05 — Assigned to lie
2016-02-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-02-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-02-19 — Use amendment accepted
2016-02-19 — Approved for registration supplemental register
2016-02-19 — Law office publication review completed
2016-02-20 — Notice of acceptance of amendment to allege use e-mailed
2016-03-29 — Registered-supplemental register
2016-11-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-11-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-03-29 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2022-10-14 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2022-10-14 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Ordonez, Melinda
New Rochelle , NY
Ordonez, Melinda
New Rochelle , NY
Correspondent
JungJin Lee Trademark Lawyer Law Firm, PLLC P.O. BOX 512 ANN ARBOR, MI 48106-0512 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2015-04-15
Status Date:
2022-10-14
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.