Trademark search for:

IMTFITNESS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2016-03-11 — Application filed
2016-03-15 — Application filed
2016-03-15 — Application filed
2016-03-16 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2016-06-23 — Assigned to examiner
2016-06-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2016-07-13 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2016-08-02 — Published for opposition
2016-08-02 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2016-09-27 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2017-03-16 — Sou teas extension received
2017-03-16 — Sou extension 1 filed
2017-03-16 — Sou extension 1 granted
2017-03-18 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2017-09-27 — Sou extension 2 filed
2017-10-30 — Application abandoned
2017-10-30 — Application abandoned
2017-12-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-12-30 — Teas petition to revive received
2017-12-30 — Petition to revive-granted
2017-12-30 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2017-12-30 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2018-01-26 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2018-01-30 — Sou extension 2 granted
2018-01-31 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-04-30 — Application abandoned
2018-04-30 — Application abandoned
2018-04-30 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Rangel, Andres Miguel Angel
Thousand Oaks , CA

Rangel, Andres Miguel Angel
Chatsworth , CA

Correspondent

RANGEL, ANDRES MIGUEL ANGEL
702 Azalea
702 Azalea
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2016-03-11

Status Date:
2018-04-30

Category:
Clothing

Filing Year:
2016

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.