Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2016 ›
NA ›
NAMASTECATION
Trademark search for:
NAMASTECATION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2016-01-07 — Application filed
2016-01-11 — Application filed
2016-01-15 — Application filed
2016-04-22 — Assigned to examiner
2016-04-22 — Final disposition recorded
2016-04-22 — Final disposition recorded
2016-04-22 — Final disposition recorded
2016-10-19 — Office action issued
2016-10-31 — Assigned to lie
2016-11-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-11-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-11-07 — Approved for pub - principal register
2016-11-15 — Law office publication review completed
2016-11-30 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2016-12-20 — Published for opposition
2016-12-20 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-02-14 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2017-08-11 — Sou teas extension received
2017-08-11 — Sou extension 1 filed
2017-08-11 — Sou extension 1 granted
2017-08-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-02-14 — Sou teas extension received
2018-02-14 — Sou extension 2 filed
2018-02-14 — Sou extension 2 granted
2018-02-16 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-09-17 — Application abandoned
2018-09-17 — Application abandoned
2018-09-17 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Grunwald, Daniel
Malibu , CA
Grunwald, Daniel
Malibu , CA
Correspondent
PAUL D. SUPNIK LAW OFFICE OF PAUL D. SUPNIK 9401 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1250 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2016-01-07
Status Date:
2018-09-17
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.