Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2017 ›
LA ›
LAZYBAN
Trademark search for:
LAZYBAN
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2017-03-27 — Application filed
2017-03-30 — Application filed
2017-03-30 — Application filed
2017-03-31 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2017-06-19 — Assigned to examiner
2017-06-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
2017-07-12 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2017-08-01 — Published for opposition
2017-08-01 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-09-26 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2018-02-12 — Sou teas extension received
2018-02-12 — Sou extension 1 filed
2018-02-12 — Sou extension 1 granted
2018-02-14 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-09-13 — Sou teas extension received
2018-09-13 — Sou extension 2 filed
2018-09-13 — Sou extension 2 granted
2018-09-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2019-03-25 — Sou teas extension received
2019-03-25 — Sou extension 3 filed
2019-03-25 — Sou extension 3 granted
2019-03-27 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2019-09-26 — Sou teas extension received
2019-09-26 — Sou extension 4 filed
2019-09-26 — Sou extension 4 granted
2019-09-28 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2020-06-08 — Application abandoned
2020-06-08 — Application abandoned
2020-06-08 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Vataj, Roza
Greenwich , CT
Vataj, Roza
Greenwich , CT
Correspondent
LIEL HOLLANDER HOLLANDER LAW, P.C. 10 BOND ST SUITE 420 GREAT NECK, NY 11021
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2017-03-27
Status Date:
2020-06-08
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.