Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2017 ›
RR ›
R.O.Y.L.
Trademark search for:
R.O.Y.L.
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2017-09-14 — Application filed
2017-09-18 — Application filed
2017-09-19 — Application filed
2017-10-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-12-19 — Assigned to examiner
2017-12-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
2018-01-10 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2018-01-30 — Published for opposition
2018-01-30 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2018-03-27 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2018-09-27 — Sou extension 1 filed
2018-10-29 — Application abandoned
2018-10-29 — Application abandoned
2018-11-29 — Teas petition to revive received
2018-11-29 — Petition to revive-granted
2018-11-29 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2018-11-29 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2019-02-05 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2019-02-05 — Sou extension 1 granted
2019-02-06 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2019-04-29 — Application abandoned
2019-04-29 — Application abandoned
2019-04-29 — Final status recorded
2021-09-28 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-09-28 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-09-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
Alaina Murphy
Charlotte , VT
Alaina Murphy
Charlotte , VT
Correspondent
Kathryn G. Kent Gerben Perrott, PLLC 1050 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 500 Washington, DC 20036 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2017-09-14
Status Date:
2019-04-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.