Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2017 ›
TH ›
THE BLACKEST BLACK
Trademark search for:
THE BLACKEST BLACK
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2017-09-29 — Application filed
2017-10-03 — Application filed
2017-10-04 — Application filed
2018-01-08 — Assigned to examiner
2018-01-16 — Final disposition recorded
2018-01-16 — Final disposition recorded
2018-01-16 — Final disposition recorded
2018-07-16 — Office action issued
2018-07-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-07-16 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-07-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-07-21 — Suspension letter written
2018-07-21 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2018-07-21 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2019-02-06 — Assigned to lie
2019-02-06 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2019-02-13 — Suspension inquiry written
2019-02-13 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2019-02-13 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2019-02-15 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2019-02-15 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2019-08-08 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2019-08-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2019-08-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2019-09-11 — Suspension letter written
2019-09-11 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2019-09-11 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2020-03-11 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2020-04-06 — Suspension inquiry written
2020-04-06 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2020-04-06 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2020-10-02 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2020-10-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2020-10-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2020-11-02 — Suspension letter written
2020-11-02 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2020-11-02 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2021-08-06 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2021-08-23 — Suspension inquiry written
2021-08-23 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2021-08-23 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2022-02-23 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2022-02-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2022-02-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2022-03-01 — Assigned to examiner
2022-03-22 — Final disposition recorded
2022-03-22 — Final disposition recorded
2022-03-22 — Final disposition recorded
2022-09-22 — Office action issued
2022-09-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2022-09-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2022-10-17 — Office action issued
2022-10-17 — Office action issued
2022-10-17 — Office action issued
2023-04-17 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2023-04-18 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2023-04-18 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2023-04-18 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2023-04-25 — Assigned to lie
2023-04-25 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2023-04-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2023-04-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2023-06-07 — Final disposition recorded
2023-06-07 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
2023-06-07 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
2023-08-21 — Exparte appeal dismissed - failure to file brief
2023-10-02 — Application abandoned
2023-10-02 — Exparte appeal terminated
2023-10-02 — Final status recorded
2023-10-04 — Application abandoned
2023-10-04 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Gildan Apparel (Canada) LP
Montréal, Québec CA
Correspondent
ERICA D. KLEIN BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C. 1000 TOWN CENTER, 22ND FLOOR SOUTHFIELD, MI 48075 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2017-09-29
Status Date:
2023-10-02
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.