Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Clothing ›
2020 ›
NO ›
NOSTALGIC GLITCH
Trademark search for:
NOSTALGIC GLITCH
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2020-08-18 — Application filed
2020-08-21 — Application filed
2020-09-20 — Application filed
2020-12-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
2020-12-14 — Assigned to examiner
2020-12-30 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2021-01-19 — Published for opposition
2021-01-19 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2021-03-16 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2021-09-08 — Sou teas extension received
2021-09-08 — Sou extension 1 filed
2021-09-08 — Sou extension 1 granted
2021-09-10 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2022-03-14 — Sou teas extension received
2022-03-14 — Sou extension 2 filed
2022-03-14 — Sou extension 2 granted
2022-03-16 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2022-07-25 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2022-07-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
2022-07-25 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2022-09-12 — Sou teas extension received
2022-09-12 — Sou extension 3 filed
2022-09-12 — Sou extension 3 granted
2022-09-14 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2023-04-17 — Application abandoned
2023-04-17 — Application abandoned
2023-04-17 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Mary Vasquez
Van Nuys , CA
Mary Vasquez
Van Nuys , CA
Correspondent
Mary Garner LZ Legal Services, LLC 101 N. Brand Boulevard, 11th Floor Glendale, CA 91203 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2020-08-18
Status Date:
2023-04-17
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.