Trademark search for:

YI ZHOU

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2022-09-02 — Application filed
2022-09-06 — Application filed
2022-09-21 — Application filed
2023-06-19 — Assigned to examiner
2023-06-25 — Final disposition recorded
2023-06-25 — Final disposition recorded
2023-06-25 — Final disposition recorded
2023-08-02 — Examiners amendment and/or priority action - completed
2023-08-02 — Combined examiner's amendment/priority action automatic entry
2023-08-02 — Examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
2023-08-02 — Notification of examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
2023-11-02 — Office action issued
2023-11-11 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received
2023-11-11 — Withdrawal of attorney granted
2023-11-16 — Application abandoned
2023-11-16 — Application abandoned
2023-11-16 — Application abandoned
2023-11-28 — Teas request for reinstatement
2023-12-26 — Assigned to petition staff
2023-12-27 — Reinstatement granted - response received
2023-12-29 — Notice of reinstatement e-mailed
2025-03-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2025-03-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2025-03-21 — Assigned to lie
2025-04-11 — Office action issued
2025-04-11 — Office action issued
2025-04-11 — Office action issued
2025-07-28 — Application abandoned
2025-07-28 — Application abandoned
2025-07-28 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Yi Zhou Inc
Beverly Hills , CA

Correspondent

yi zhou inc
468 North Camden Drive, 2F
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
United States

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2022-09-02

Status Date:
2025-07-28

Category:
Clothing

Filing Year:
2022

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.