Brandinium

Trademark search for:

MAMCO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1982-03-10 — Application filed
  • 1982-08-31 — Published for opposition
  • 1982-11-23 — Registered-principal register
  • 1988-09-02 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
  • 1988-10-26 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2002-10-22 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2002-10-23 — Paper received
  • 2002-10-23 — Registered - sec. 9 filed/check record for sec. 8
  • 2003-02-06 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2003-02-06 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2008-04-03 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2012-02-15 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2012-03-02 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2012-03-02 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2012-03-02 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
  • 2015-01-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-01-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2018-01-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-11-23 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2023-06-02 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2023-06-02 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Mold-A-Matic Corporation
Oneonta , NY
Mold-A-Matic Corporation
Oneonta , NY
Mold-A-Matic Corporation
Oneonta , NY

Correspondent

Michael Neustel Neustel Law Offices, LTD
2534 South University Drive
Suite 4
Fargo, ND 58103

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1982-03-10
Status Date:
2023-06-02
Filing Year:
1982

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.