Brandinium

Trademark search for:

PRO-TUFF

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-07-12 — Application filed
  • 2004-07-20 — Application filed
  • 2004-08-27 — Paper received
  • 2004-08-27 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
  • 2004-09-20 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2004-12-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2005-02-15 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-03-01 — Priority action written
  • 2005-03-01 — Priority action e-mailed
  • 2005-03-03 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2005-03-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2005-03-03 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2005-03-04 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-03-05 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2005-06-01 — Notice of publication
  • 2005-06-21 — Published for opposition
  • 2005-09-13 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2006-02-20 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2006-02-23 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2006-02-23 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2006-02-23 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2006-05-31 — Paper received
  • 2006-08-21 — Review of correspondence complete
  • 2006-09-14 — Final status recorded
  • 2006-11-24 — Application abandoned
  • 2006-11-24 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

Stock Building Supply Holdings, Inc.
Raleigh , NC
Stock Building Supply Holdings, Inc.
Raleigh , NC

Correspondent

DOUGLAS W KENYON HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP
PO BOX 109
RALEIGH, NC 27602-0109
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-07-12
Status Date:
2006-09-14
Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.