Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Construction & Repair ›
2006 ›
XX ›
X·IT
Trademark search for:
X·IT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-01-05 — Application filed
2006-01-10 — Application filed
2006-03-22 — Teas voluntary amendment received
2006-03-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-04-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-05-07 — Assigned to examiner
2006-05-09 — Final disposition recorded
2006-05-09 — Final disposition recorded
2006-11-09 — Office action issued
2006-12-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-12-01 — Assigned to lie
2006-12-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-01-07 — Office action issued
2007-01-07 — Office action issued
2007-07-07 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2007-07-07 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2007-07-07 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2007-07-09 — Office action issued
2007-07-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-07-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-07-23 — Final disposition recorded
2007-07-23 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
2007-07-23 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
2008-01-14 — Exparte appeal dismissed - failure to file brief
2008-02-28 — Application abandoned
2008-02-28 — Exparte appeal terminated
2008-02-28 — Final status recorded
2008-02-29 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Rhodes Design and Development Corp.
Las Vegas , NV
Correspondent
MICHAEL T MURPHY BELL, BOYD & LLOYD LLC PO BOX 1135 CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-01-05
Status Date:
2008-02-28
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.