Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ABIBOW

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2008-01-04 — Application filed
  • 2008-01-08 — Application filed
  • 2008-03-28 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-03-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-03-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-03-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-09-29 — Office action issued
  • 2008-10-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-10-14 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-10-14 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-10-15 — Priority action written
  • 2008-10-15 — Priority action e-mailed
  • 2008-10-15 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
  • 2009-04-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-04-09 — Office action issued
  • 2009-04-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-04-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-04-13 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-04-24 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2009-05-05 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2009-05-07 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-05-08 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-05-08 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-05-22 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2009-06-05 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2009-06-10 — Priority action written
  • 2009-06-10 — Priority action e-mailed
  • 2009-06-10 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
  • 2009-12-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-12-10 — Office action issued
  • 2009-12-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-12-12 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-12-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-12-12 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-12-12 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-12-12 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-12-15 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-01-19 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-01-19 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-04-13 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-10-12 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-10-12 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2010-10-12 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2010-10-14 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-12-22 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2011-04-12 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-04-12 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2011-04-14 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2011-04-14 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2011-04-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-10-11 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-10-11 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2011-10-20 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2011-10-21 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-04-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2012-04-12 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-04-12 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2012-04-16 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2012-04-17 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-06-13 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2012-07-10 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2012-11-12 — Application abandoned
  • 2012-11-12 — Final status recorded
  • 2012-11-13 — Application abandoned
  • 2014-07-30 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically

Owner Information

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.
MONTREAL CA
AbitibiBowater Inc.
Montreal CA
AbitibiBowater Inc.
Montreal CA

Correspondent

THEODORE D. LIENESCH THOMPSON HINE LLP
10050 Innovation Drive, Suite 400
DAYTON, OH 45342-4934
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-01-04
Status Date:
2012-11-12
Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.