Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CITY VIEW BUSINESS PARK

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2008-07-16 — Application filed
  • 2008-07-21 — Application filed
  • 2008-10-23 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-10-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-10-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-10-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-05-27 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-05-27 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-07-24 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2009-07-24 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2009-08-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-08-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-08-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-02-08 — Letter of protest evidence forwarded
  • 2010-03-03 — Office action issued
  • 2010-03-03 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-03-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-03-08 — Data modification completed
  • 2010-03-08 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-03-11 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-04-19 — Office action issued
  • 2010-04-19 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2010-04-19 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2010-04-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-04-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-05-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-05-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-05-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-11-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2010-11-18 — Office action issued
  • 2010-11-18 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-11-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-12-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-12-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-12-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-06-19 — Office action issued
  • 2011-06-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-06-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-07-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-07-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-07-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-01-06 — Office action issued
  • 2012-01-06 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-01-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-02-03 — Office action issued
  • 2012-02-03 — Office action issued
  • 2012-02-03 — Office action issued
  • 2012-03-09 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2012-03-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2012-03-09 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-03-09 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-03-09 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2012-03-11 — Assigned to lie
  • 2012-03-13 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2012-03-28 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2012-04-17 — Published for opposition
  • 2012-04-17 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2012-07-03 — Registered-principal register
  • 2017-07-03 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2017-07-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2017-07-10 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2017-08-15 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2017-08-15 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2017-08-15 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2021-07-03 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2023-01-13 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2023-01-13 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Apex 385, LLC
Las Vegas , NV
Apex 385, LLC
Las Vegas , NV
Apex 385, LLC
Las Vegas , NV

Correspondent

Apex 385, LLC
7475 W Sahara Ave, Ste 100
7475 W Sahara Ave., #100
LAS VEGAS, NV 89117

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-07-16
Status Date:
2023-01-13
Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.