Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Construction & Repair ›
2009 ›
NE ›
NETECS
Trademark search for:
NETECS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-02-11 — Application filed
2009-02-14 — Application filed
2009-02-17 — Application filed
2009-05-02 — Assigned to examiner
2009-05-05 — Final disposition recorded
2009-05-06 — Final disposition recorded
2009-11-09 — Paper received
2009-11-19 — Amendment from applicant entered
2009-11-19 — Assigned to lie
2009-11-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-12-07 — Suspension letter written
2009-12-08 — Letter of suspension mailed
2010-01-12 — Paper received
2010-01-13 — Amendment from applicant entered
2010-01-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-01-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-01-26 — Law office publication review completed
2010-02-10 — Notice of publication
2010-03-02 — Published for opposition
2010-05-25 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-11-16 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2010-11-16 — Paper received
2010-12-01 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-12-02 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2011-01-11 — Registered-principal register
2017-08-18 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2017-08-18 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
NETECS GmbH Maschinenbau & Anlagenbau
07619 Schkolen DE
NETECS GmbH Maschinenbau & Anlagenbau
07619 Schkolen DE
NETECS GmbH Maschinenbau & Anlagenbau
07619 Schkolen DE
Correspondent
KATHRYN E. GARIPAY OLSON & CEPURITIS, LTD. 20 N WACKER DR FL 36 CHICAGO, IL 60606-3103 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-02-11
Status Date:
2017-08-18
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.