Trademark search for:

RENUENT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2015-04-21 — Application filed
2015-04-24 — Application filed
2015-04-30 — Application filed
2015-07-29 — Assigned to examiner
2015-07-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-08-19 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2015-09-08 — Published for opposition
2015-09-08 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2015-11-03 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-05-03 — Sou extension 1 filed
2016-06-06 — Application abandoned
2016-06-06 — Application abandoned
2016-06-21 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2016-06-21 — Use amendment filed
2016-06-21 — Petition to revive-granted
2016-06-21 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2016-06-21 — Teas petition to revive received
2016-06-21 — Teas statement of use received
2016-07-16 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2016-07-18 — Sou extension 1 granted
2016-07-18 — Statement of use processing complete
2016-07-19 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2016-08-09 — Final disposition recorded
2016-08-09 — Final disposition recorded
2016-08-09 — Final disposition recorded
2017-03-21 — Application abandoned
2017-03-21 — Final status recorded
2017-03-22 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

KATAN TECHNOLOGIES IP PTE. LTD.
St. Paul , MN

KATAN TECHNOLOGIES IP PTE. LTD.
St. Paul , MN

Correspondent

KATAN TECHNOLOGIES IP PTE. LTD.
10181 Bridgewater Ct
Saint Paul, MN 55129-8588
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2015-04-21

Status Date:
2017-03-21

Category:
Construction & Repair

Filing Year:
2015

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.