Trademark search for:

NETEXXL

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2009-12-17 — Application filed
2009-12-21 — Application filed
2009-12-23 — Application filed
2010-03-18 — Assigned to examiner
2010-03-21 — Final disposition recorded
2010-03-21 — Final disposition recorded
2010-03-21 — Final disposition recorded
2010-07-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-07-08 — Office action issued
2010-07-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-08-06 — Teas change of owner address received
2010-08-06 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2010-08-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-08-30 — Assigned to lie
2010-08-30 — Law office publication review completed
2010-10-05 — Published for opposition
2010-10-05 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-12-21 — Registered-principal register
2014-07-16 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2014-07-17 — Review of correspondence complete - power of attorney entered
2015-01-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
2015-12-21 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2017-07-28 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2017-07-28 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Cordenet-Produtora De Redes Agrícolas, S.A.
Esmoriz 3885-456 PT

Cordenet-Produtora De Redes Agrícolas, S.A.
Esmoriz 3885-456 PT

Cordenet-Produtora De Redes Agrícolas, S.A.
Esmoriz 3885-456 PT

Correspondent

James L. Bikoff Smith, Gambrell & Russell
1055 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW
Suite 400
Washington, DC 20007

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-12-17

Status Date:
2017-07-28

Category:
Cordage & Fibers

Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.