Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Cosmetics & Cleaning ›
1986 ›
UN ›
UN PARFUM D'AVENTURE
Trademark search for:
UN PARFUM D'AVENTURE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1986-02-18 — Application filed
1986-04-18 — Assigned to examiner
1986-04-29 — Final disposition recorded
1986-10-28 — Correspondence received in law office
1986-12-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
1986-12-22 — Notice of publication
1987-01-27 — Published for opposition
1987-04-21 — Registered-principal register
1989-08-09 — Miscellaneous paper
1992-07-13 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1992-10-30 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2006-10-30 — Case file in ticrs
2007-04-19 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2007-04-19 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-04-19 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2007-04-19 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2007-05-22 — Assigned to paralegal
2007-06-18 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2007-06-18 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2012-05-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2012-05-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2016-04-21 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2018-02-23 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)
2018-02-23 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
BREMA FRANCE
75008 Paris FR
RHODIC S.A.
ECULLY FR
RHODIC S.A.
ECULLY FR
RHODIC S.A.
ECULLY FR
Correspondent
Milena S. Mishev McCarthy Fingar LLP 11 Martine Avenue 12th Floor White Plains, NY 10606-1934
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1986-02-18
Status Date:
2018-02-23
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.