Trademark search for:

SCENTS TO MIST

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1988-09-02 — Application filed
1988-12-16 — Final disposition recorded
1989-06-12 — Correspondence received in law office
1989-07-10 — Correspondence received in law office
1989-07-10 — Correspondence received in law office
1989-07-29 — Office action issued
1989-09-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
1989-10-14 — Notice of publication
1989-11-14 — Published for opposition
1990-02-13 — Registered-principal register
1995-04-05 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1995-11-30 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
1999-08-26 — Registered - sec. 9 filed/check record for sec. 8
1999-10-18 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2008-12-04 — Case file in ticrs
2009-11-30 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2010-01-04 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
2010-01-04 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2010-01-04 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2019-02-13 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2021-10-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-10-15 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

GILBERTIE'S HERB GARDENS INC.
EASTON , CT

GILBERTIE'S HERB GARDENS INC.
EASTON , CT

GILBERTIE'S HERB GARDENS INC.
EASTON , CT

Correspondent

George A. Coury BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, P.C.
900 Chapel Street
Suite 1201
NEW HAVEN, CT 06510-2802

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1988-09-02

Status Date:
2021-10-15

Category:
Cosmetics & Cleaning

Filing Year:
1988

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.