Trademark search for:

BEWEST

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1991-05-29 — Application filed
1991-08-29 — Assigned to examiner
1991-10-11 — Final disposition recorded
1991-11-22 — Correspondence received in law office
1992-02-03 — Office action issued
1992-02-13 — Correspondence received in law office
1992-03-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
1992-06-05 — Notice of publication
1992-07-07 — Published for opposition
1992-09-29 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1993-03-09 — Sou extension 1 filed
1993-04-22 — Sou extension 1 granted
1993-09-10 — Use amendment filed
1993-10-26 — Statement of use processing complete
1993-11-18 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
1994-02-15 — Registered-principal register
2000-02-08 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) filed
2000-05-15 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2004-01-16 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2004-01-16 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2004-03-09 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2004-03-09 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2007-08-31 — Case file in ticrs
2011-03-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-02-19 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-02-19 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

PUNTO ROJO S.A.
Alajuela CR

PUNTO ROJO S.A.
Alajuela CR

PUNTO ROJO S.A.
Alajuela CR

Correspondent

DANIEL F. ZENDEL Ladas & Parry LLP
1040 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10018-3738
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1991-05-29

Status Date:
2016-02-19

Category:
Cosmetics & Cleaning

Filing Year:
1991

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.