Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Cosmetics & Cleaning ›
2000 ›
NY ›
NY. LOOKS
Trademark search for:
NY. LOOKS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2000-12-22 — Application filed
2001-06-16 — Assigned to examiner
2001-06-22 — Final disposition recorded
2001-12-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-12-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-03-13 — Assigned to examiner
2002-03-15 — Final disposition recorded
2002-05-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-07-08 — Sec. 44(e) claim deleted
2002-08-12 — Office action issued
2002-09-27 — Paper received
2002-09-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-10-17 — Assigned to examiner
2002-11-22 — Assigned to examiner
2002-11-22 — Assigned to examiner
2002-11-25 — Final disposition recorded
2002-12-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-01-15 — Notice of publication
2003-02-04 — Published for opposition
2003-03-17 — Extension of time to oppose received
2003-06-27 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2005-01-25 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
2005-01-25 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2005-01-25 — Application abandoned
2005-01-25 — Application abandoned
2005-01-25 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
NY. LOOKS INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO LTDA
Distrito Industrial Cetulio Vargas II BR
NY. LOOKS INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO LTDA
Distrito Industrial Cetulio Vargas II BR
Correspondent
DAVID L SIGALOW ALLEN DYER DOPPELT MILBRATH & GILCHRIST 255 S ORANGE AVE STE 1401 ORLANDO, FL 32801 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2000-12-22
Status Date:
2005-01-25
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.