Brandinium

Trademark search for:

DR. LEWINN

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2001-10-11 — Application filed
  • 2002-01-15 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-01-16 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-01-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2002-06-27 — Office action issued
  • 2002-06-27 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2002-07-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2002-08-26 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2002-10-03 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-10-03 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2002-10-03 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-10-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-04-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-04-07 — Paper received
  • 2003-05-05 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2003-05-05 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2003-05-22 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2003-05-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2003-05-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2003-07-02 — Notice of publication
  • 2003-07-22 — Published for opposition
  • 2003-10-14 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2004-04-13 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2004-04-19 — Paper received
  • 2004-04-28 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2004-09-28 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2004-09-28 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2004-10-05 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2005-01-27 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2005-03-03 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2005-03-03 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2005-03-03 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2005-10-12 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2005-10-12 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2005-10-21 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2006-04-05 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2006-04-05 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2006-04-24 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2006-09-19 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2006-09-19 — Use amendment filed
  • 2006-10-16 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2006-12-04 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-12-06 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2006-12-20 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-12-20 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2007-01-30 — Registered-principal register
  • 2009-12-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-12-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-12-09 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-12-09 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2011-03-22 — Teas section 7 request received
  • 2011-03-23 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2011-03-23 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2011-03-29 — Amendment under section 7 - processed
  • 2012-03-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2012-03-15 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2012-04-07 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2012-04-07 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2012-04-07 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2012-04-09 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - mailed
  • 2015-01-21 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2016-01-30 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2017-09-01 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2017-09-01 — Final status recorded
  • 2025-04-16 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically

Owner Information

PRIVATE FORMULA CORPORATION
Irvine , CA
PRIVATE FORMULA CORPORATION
Port Melbourne, Victoria AU
PRIVATE FORMULA CORPORATION
South Melbourne, Victoria AU

Correspondent

MATTHEW MARSHALL PRIVATE FORMULA CORPORATION
7545 Irvine Center Dr., Suite 100
Legal Dept.
Irvine, CA 92618

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2001-10-11
Status Date:
2017-09-01
Filing Year:
2001

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.